Monday, September 18, 2023

Trident Studios inconsistency (why was 'Ride a white swan' recorded on 8 track?)

Yesterday I was watching a YouTube video with record producer Tony Visconti diving into the multi-track recordings of two T-Rex songs, "Jeepster" and "Ride a white swan". "Jeepster" was started in Los Angeles and was recorded on 16 track, but Visconti points out that he was used to working with 8 track recorders and so only about 12 tracks were used, leaving 4 empty. "Ride a white swan" was recorded at Trident Studios on 1 July 1970 and was an 8 track recording. Visconti played the various tracks and noted that they initially recorded three tracks of backing vocals that were bounced down to one track, freeing up two tracks.

Wait a minute - Van der Graaf Generator recorded "The least we can do" at the end of December 1969 at Trident studios, at least four months before "Ride a white swan". All of the songs bar one were recorded on 8 tracks, but the final song, "After the flood", was recorded on 16 tracks. There were problems with aligning the 16 track machine which is why recording that song took longer than the others. 

So if Trident had fixed their 16 track machine by the end of December 1969, why was Visconti recording T-Rex on 8 tracks several months later? It's not as if Visconti misremembered, as he played each one of the eight tracks. At this stage in their career, T-Rex was still considered a dippy, trippy act ("Ride a white swan" was their first hit) so Marc Bolan would not have been paying for the recording time. Maybe the record company didn't want to pay the extra cost for using the 16 track machine.

A conundrum to which I will probably never find the answer.



This day in history:

Blog #Date TitleTags
1018/09/2005Little criminalsRandy Newman
40718/09/2011Continuing the dietDiet, Acupuncture
75718/09/2014Walking with the GPSHealth, Mobile phone
107318/09/2017Literature review - I don't believe this!ERP, DBA
116918/09/2018Vinyl log #29 - 17 SeptemberVinyl log, City Boy
142518/09/2021Popup menus: a misconceptionProgramming, Delphi

No comments: