I've just had the dubious pleasure of watching the televised version of Peter
Robinson's novel "Aftermath", dubious in many ways. This is probably the
hardest Inspector Banks novel to read, being the horrifying story of a male
psychopath who sexually and physically tortured then killed four young girls,
as well as the story of his wife who was caged, abused and raped by her
parents as a child and grew up to be a worse psychopath than her husband ("he
thought that he was using me but in fact I was using him").
Of all the Banks novels, ITV chose to dramatise this one, so I knew that
watching the two part series would not be an easy matter. In the end, I think
that the production company managed to tone down the horror of the story. It's
difficult for me to judge because so many items were changed, it's almost as
if the television programme exists sui genesis with no connection to
the novel.
Obviously, the story had to be edited, for there is no way that such a
complicated narrative could be compressed into less than two hours. But
leaving aside the edit, there were so many changes, some of them
seemingly unnecessary.... For example, DCI Banks is frequently described as
being short (just meeting the minimum height requirement for a policeman) with
black curly hair, whereas one of his team, DC Winsome Jackman, is a black
Jamaican woman over 6 feet tall. Thus Jackson should tower over Banks.
Instead, Banks is played by
Stephen Tomkinson
whose height is 6' 2" and who towers over the actress playing Jackman. Banks
is supposed to be a kindly policeman; he comes over as irascible and far from
sympathetic.
For no apparent reason, the psychopathic Terence Payne is renamed Marcus
Payne; on television he had an affair with neighbour Maggie Forrest (played
with an Irish accent instead of a Canadian one), something which barely
matters in the tv show and never existed in the book. Lucy Payne's solicitor
is renamed at random. Annie Cabbot is only a DS when she and Banks meet for
the first time in the Superintendent's office: true, when they first met in a
book, she was a DS, but then she was serving in CID and not Complaints.
In the book 'Aftermath', Cabbot is a DI (in Complaints); she and Banks are
good friends and not meeting for the first time. Similarly Banks has been
demoted: normally he is a DCI, but in the book he is promoted to 'acting
Superintendent'; in the television series he is 'acting chief inspector'.
The entire Leanne Wray plot is treated in a completely different manner in the
tv show than in the book, for possibly dramatic reasons. The character of
(presumably) her father is greatly extended (and invented), and the pregnant
17 year old girl is a total figment of the scriptwriter's imagination, another
invention which makes no difference whatsoever to the story but serves only to
annoy me.
I don't know whether anyone would be tempted into reading the book after reading the dramatisation, but if they did, they would be left wondering whether they were reading the same story.
Why, why, WHY?
No comments:
Post a Comment